Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part II - Crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers
Keywords: dynamics, stimulation, intravenous, heat, trial, mechanism, recovery, alpha, efficacy, experiment, humans, crossover, pain, scale, human, male, receptor, selectivity, measurement, algorithms, agent, infusion, adult, mechanics, adrenergic, drug, sleep, article, ventilation, visual, opioid, nonlinear, respiratory, analog, hypnotics, artificial, analgesics, activity, remifentanil, sedatives, cross-over, controlled, clinical, sedation, studies, analgesic, thermal, study, dexmedetomidine, priority, journal, 2, normal, and, Infusions,, Analgesics,, procedure, opiate, Stimulating, anesthetic, Piperidines
Abstract
Background: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective ?2- adrenoceptor agonist used for short-term sedation of mechanically ventilated patients. The analgesic profile of dexmedetomidine has not been fully characterized in humans. Methods: This study was designed to compare the analgesic responses of six healthy male volunteers during stepwise target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. A computer-controlled thermode was used to deliver painful heat stimuli to the volar side of the forearms of the subjects. Six sequential 5-s stimuli (ranging 41° to 50°C) were delivered in random order. The recorded visual analog scale was used to fit an Emax model. Results: Compared to baseline, remifentanil infusions resulted in a right shift of the sigmoid curve (increased T 50, the temperature producing a visual analog scale score of 50% of the maximal effect, from 46.1°C at baseline to 48.4° and 49.1°C during remifentanil infusions) without a change of the steepness of the curve (identical Hill coefficients ? during baseline and remifentanil). Compared to baseline, dexmedetomidine infusions resulted in both a right shift of the sigmoid curve (increased T50 to 47.2°C) and a decrease in the steepness of the curve (decreased ? from 3.24 during baseline and remifentanil infusions to 2.45 during dexmedetomidine infusions). There was no difference in the pain responses between baseline and after recovery from remifentanil infusions (identical T50 and ?). Conclusion: As expected, dexmedetomidine is not as effective an analgesic as the opioid remifentanil. The difference in the quality of the analgesia with remifentanil may be a reflection of a different mechanism of action or a consequence of the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine.
Más información
Título según SCOPUS: | Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part II - Crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers |
Título de la Revista: | ANESTHESIOLOGY |
Volumen: | 101 |
Número: | 5 |
Editorial: | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
Fecha de publicación: | 2004 |
Página de inicio: | 1077 |
Página final: | 1083 |
Idioma: | English |
URL: | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-7244220115&partnerID=q2rCbXpz |
DOI: |
10.1097/00000542-200411000-00006 |
Notas: | SCOPUS |