Abstract

This paper argues for tolerance of somes " harmless or victimless inmoralities". To this end -and taking into account both Joseph Raz's perfectionist liberalism, and the critique of the latter by Robert P. George- arguments are set forth for tolerance of some evils aimed at avoiding using people as a means. In conclusion, it is stated that, although mistakenly, people should be free to carry out consented actions which infringe upon harm principle.