The Neglected Dimension of Global Security A Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises

National Academy of Medicine, Secretariat; Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future; Sanders, P; Tomori, O; Aguilera, X; Agyepong. I; Chesson-Wureh, Y; Farmer, P; Freire, M.; Frenk, J.; Gostin, L; Leung, G.; Omaswa, F.; Parker, M; Rao, S.; Ryan, D; et. al.

Keywords: prevention, infectious disease, Health and Medicine, Global Health Conflict and Security Issues, Security and Response Health and Medicine

Abstract

Since the 2014 Ebola outbreak, many public- and private-sector leaders have seen a need for improved management of global public health emergencies. The effects of the Ebola epidemic go well beyond the three hardest-hit countries and beyond the health sector. Education, child protection, commerce, transportation, and human rights have all suffered. The consequences and lethality of Ebola have increased interest in coordinated global response to infectious threats, many of which could disrupt global health and commerce far more than the recent outbreak. In order to explore the potential for improving international management and response to outbreaks, the National Academy of Medicine agreed to manage an international, independent, evidence-based, authoritative, multistakeholder expert commission. As part of this effort, the Institute of Medicine convened four workshops in summer of 2015. This commission report considers the evidence supplied by these workshops and offers conclusions and actionable recommendations to guide policymakers, international funders, civil society organizations, and the private sector.

Más información

Editorial: The National Academies Press
Fecha de publicación: 2016
Página final: 142
Idioma: english
Financiamiento/Sponsor: The Commission was supported by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, the Ford Foundation, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Mr. Ming Wai Lau, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation, the U.S. Agency for International Developme
URL: http://nam.edu/GHRFreport https://doi.org/10.17226/21891
Notas: Consensus Study Report: Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.