Abstract

As a consequence of the massive titling policy implemented by the Peruvian government from 1996, thousands of citizens have become individual landowners; but this legal ownership has not improved the minimum habitability in urban settlements. We present a case study on the neighborhoods resulting from this mode of land production in the Metropolitan Area of Lima, proving that social organization is the one actually in charge of achieving urban consolidation, replacing the role of the State. It is concluded that this policy has induced in social organizations, the valuation of the private good over the collective struggle for the construction of the urban habitat, which is not only blocked, but also stopped. This situation is constantly reinforced by state institutions and the effects of economic restructuring.