Use of high doses of folic acid supplements in pregnant women in Spain: an INMA cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: We examined the use of low (400 mu g/day, including no use) and high folic acid supplement (FAS) dosages (>= 1000 mu g/day) among pregnant women in Spain, and explored factors associated with the use of these non-recommended dosages. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: Spain. Participants: We analysed data from 2332 pregnant women of the INMA study, a prospective mother-child cohort study in Spain. Main outcome measures: We assessed usual dietary folate and the use of FAS from preconception to the 3rd month (first period) and from the 4th to the 7th month (second period), using a validated food frequency questionnaire. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate relative risk ratios (RRRs). Results: Over a half of the women used low dosages of FAS in the first and second period while 29% and 17% took high dosages of FAS, respectively. In the first period, tobacco smoking (RRR=1.63), alcohol intake (RRR=1.40), multiparous (RRR=1.44), unplanned pregnancy (RRR=4.20) and previous spontaneous abortion (RRR=0.58, lower use of high FAS dosages among those with previous abortions) were significantly associated with low FAS dosages. Alcohol consumption (RRR=1.42), unplanned pregnancy (RRR=2.66) and previous spontaneous abortion (RRR=0.68) were associated with high dosage use. In the second period, only tobacco smoking was significantly associated with high FAS dosage use (RRR=0.67). Conclusions: A high proportion of pregnant women did not reach the recommended dosages of FAS in periconception and a considerable proportion also used FAS dosages >= 1000 mu g/day. Action should be planned by the Health Care System and health professionals to improve the appropriate periconceptional use of FAS, taking into consideration the associated factors.
Más información
| Título según WOS: | ID WOS:000368840100120 Not found in local WOS DB |
| Título de la Revista: | BMJ OPEN |
| Volumen: | 5 |
| Número: | 11 |
| Editorial: | BMJ Publishing Group |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| DOI: |
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009202 |
| Notas: | ISI |