Systematic Establishment of Robustness and Standards in Patient-Derived Xenograft Experiments and Analysis

Evrard, Yvonne A.; Srivastava, Anuj; Randjelovic, Jelena; Doroshow, James H.; Dean, Dennis A., II; Morris, Jeffrey S.; Chuang, Jeffrey H.; NCI PDXNet Consortium

Abstract

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are tumor-in-mouse models for cancer. PDX collections, such as the NCI PDXNet, are powerful resources for preclinical therapeutic testing. However, variations in experimental and analysis procedures have limited interpretability. To determine the robustness of PDX studies, the PDXNet tested temozolomide drug response for three prevalidated PDX models (sensitive, resistant, and intermediate) across four blinded PDX Development and Trial Centers using independently selected standard operating procedures. Each PDTC was able to correctly identify the sensitive, resistant, and intermediate models, and statistical evaluations were concordant across all groups. We also developed and benchmarked optimized PDX informatics pipelines, and these yielded robust assessments across xenograft biological replicates. These studies show that PDX drug responses and sequence results are reproducible across diverse experimental protocols. In addition, we share the range of experimental procedures that maintained robustness, as well as standardized cloud-based workflows for PDX exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing analyses and for evaluating growth. Significance: The PDXNet Consortium shows that PDX drug responses and sequencing results are reproducible across diverse experimental protocols, establishing the potential for multisite preclinical studies to translate into clinical trials.

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000537843200020 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: CANCER RESEARCH
Volumen: 80
Número: 11
Editorial: AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
Fecha de publicación: 2020
Página de inicio: 2286
Página final: 2297
DOI:

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3101

Notas: ISI