Expert arguments for trends of psychiatric bed numbers: A systematic review of qualitative data (vol 12, 745247, 2021)
Keywords: inpatient, institutionalization, consensus, length of stay, Expert recommendation, psychiatric hospital beds, general hospital psychiatry
Abstract
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. Column headings are labeled as âHigh- and upper-middle income countries (HIC)â and âLower-Middle and Low-Income countries (LMIC)â. The heading should read âHigh-Income Countries (HIC)â and âLow- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC)," respectively. Zeros were erroneously inserted in several lines that should have been blank, On page 12 1.1. Cost effectiveness 1.2 Inappropriate use of inpatient care 1.4. Quality of care is maintained or improved with less beds 1.5. Less psychiatric bed needs On page 13 Expert arguments to increase or maintain psychiatric bed numbers 2.1 Lack of beds for financial pressure 2.3 High demand of psychiatric beds 2.4 Inadequately short length of stay.
Más información
| Título según WOS: | Expert arguments for trends of psychiatric bed numbers: A systematic review of qualitative data (vol 12, 745247, 2021) |
| Título según SCOPUS: | Corrigendum: Expert arguments for trends of psychiatric bed numbers: A systematic review of qualitative data, (Front. Psychiatry, (2022), 12, (745247), 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745247 |
| Título de la Revista: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
| Volumen: | 13 |
| Editorial: | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| Idioma: | English |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.957272 |
| Notas: | ISI, SCOPUS |