Abstract

There are multiple evaluation approaches (methods, instruments, and tools) that can be used for evaluating the CX0. However, these may not be considered by different companies/organizations because they assume that these are not related to the CX. This research analyze 29 evaluation approaches identified in a previous study (Rojas and Quiñones 2021) used in the areas of usability, user experience (UX), and satisfaction. We differentiate and examine these evaluation approaches indicating: (1) the type of participants required to apply them (experts or users); (2) the overall costs needed to use them (cheap or expensive); (3) some disadvantages or potential risks of them; and (4) the CX dimensions that could be evaluated. We found that: (1) most evaluation approaches (69%) require representative users rather than expert evaluators; (2) most evaluation approach (86,2%) are inexpensive to use since they do not need equipment or training; and (3) the most evaluated CX dimension corresponded to “sensorial”, while the least evaluated CX dimension was “emotional”.