Star formation at z ? 6: i-dropouts in the advanced camera for surveys guaranteed time observation fields

Bouwens, R. J.; Illingworth, G. D.; Magee, D; Rosati, P; Lidman, C; Broadhurst, T; Franx, M; Miley, G. K.; Ford, H. C.; Benítez N.; Blakeslee, J. P.; Meurer, G. R.; Hartig G.F.; Ardila, D. R.; Cross, N J G; et. al.

Abstract

Using an. i - z dropout criterion, we determine the space density of z ? 6 galaxies from two deep ACS GTO fields with deep optical-IR imaging. A total of 23 objects are found over 46 arcmin 2, or ?0.5 ± 0.1 objects arcmin -2 down to Z AB ? 27.3 (6 ?), or a completeness-corrected ?0.5 ± 0.2 objects arcmin -2 down to Z AB ? 26.5 (including one probable z ? 6 active galactic nucleus). Combining deep ISAAC data for our RDCS 1252-2927 field (J AB ? 25.7 and K S,AB ? 25.0; 5 ?) and NICMOS data for the Hubble Deep Field-North (J 110,AB and H 160,AB ? 27.3, 5 ?), we verify that these dropouts have relatively flat spectral slopes, as one would expect for star-forming objects at z ? 6. Compared with the average-color (? = -1.3) U-dropout in the Steidel et al. z ? 3 sample, i-dropouts in our sample range in luminosity from ?1.5L* (z AB ? 25.6) to ?0.3L* (z AB ? 27.3) with the exception of one very bright candidate at z 850,AB ? 24.2. The half-light radii vary from 0.?09 to 0.?21, or 0.5 kpc to 1.3 kpc. We derive the z ? 6 rest-frame UV luminosity density (or star formation rate density) by using three different procedures. All three procedures use simulations based on a slightly lower redshift (z ? 5) V 606-dropout sample from Chandra Deep Field-South ACS images. First, we make a direct comparison of our findings with a no-evolution projection of this V-dropout sample, allowing us to automatically correct for the light lost at faint magnitudes or lower surface brightnesses. We find 23% ± 25% more i-dropouts than we predict, consistent with no strong evolution over this redshift range. Adopting previous results to z ? 5, this works out to a mere 20% ± 29% drop in the luminosity density from z ? 3 to z ? 6. Second, we use the same V-dropout simulations to derive a detailed selection function for our i-dropout sample and compute the UV-luminosity density [(7.2 ± 2.5) × 10 25 ergs s -1 Hz -1 Mpc -3 down to z AB ? 27]. We find a 39% ± 21% drop over the same redshift range (z ? 3-6), consistent with the first estimate. This is our preferred value and suggests a star formation rate of 0.0090 ± 0.0031 M ? yr -1 Mpc -3 to z AB ? 27, or ?0.036 ± 0.012 M ? yr -1 Mpc -3 by extrapolating the luminosity function to the faint limit, assuming ? = - 1.6, Third, we follow a very similar procedure, except that we assume no incompleteness, and find a rest-frame continuum luminosity that is ?2-3 times lower than our other two determinations. This final estimate is to be taken as a lower limit and is important if there are modest changes in the colors or surface brightnesses from z ? 5 to z ? 6 (the other estimates assume no large changes in the intrinsic select-ability of objects). We note that all three estimates are well within the canonical range of luminosity densities necessary for reionization of the universe at this epoch by star-forming galaxies.

Más información

Título de la Revista: ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volumen: 595
Número: 2 I
Editorial: IOP PUBLISHING LTD
Fecha de publicación: 2003
Página de inicio: 589
Página final: 602
URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0142230369&partnerID=q2rCbXpz