Sugerencias para mejorar la calidad de las revistas científicas chilenas: una aplicación en las ciencias forestales con Bosque
Keywords: chile, Publicaciones científicas, Scientific publications, Arbitraje, peer-review process, forest research, scielo, investigación forestal
Abstract
We comment on several topics of the Chilean scientific journals indexed in SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) regarding: manuscript format, article format, review process, and other aspects that could improve their reputation and name and enhance recognition by international journals. Some of these topics are further developed, taking as example Bosque, the most important Chilean forestry journal and the only one that is indexed in SciELO. We suggest to increase the practice of accepting a wider range of manuscript computational formats, to establish an on-line system for submitting manuscripts (currently, 43.3% of the journals still require hardcopy submissions), to provide a template file for manuscripts to be available online, to streamline the categories of contributions accepted by journals, to establish the blind peer-review process (only 6% of the journals use it), and to have associate editors. Also, we suggest for Bosque to broaden the institutional diversity of reviewers
Más información
Título según SCIELO: | Sugerencias para mejorar la calidad de las revistas cient�ficas chilenas: una aplicaci�n en las ciencias forestales con Bosque |
Título de la Revista: | BOSQUE |
Volumen: | 29 |
Número: | 1 |
Editorial: | UNIV AUSTRAL CHILE, FAC CIENCIAS FORESTALES |
Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
Página de inicio: | 3 |
Página final: | 10 |
Idioma: | es |
URL: | http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-92002008000100001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en |
DOI: |
10.4067/S0717-92002008000100001 |
Notas: | SCIELO |