Investigation of bias related to differences between case and control interview dates in five INTERPHONE countries

Cardis, Elisabeth; Krewski, Daniel; Turner, Michelle C.; Hours, Martine; Langer, Chelsea E.; McBride, Mary L.; Figuerola, Jordi; Parent, Marie-Elise; Chetrit, Angela; Richardson, Lesley; Sadetzki, Siegal; Siemiatycki, Jack; Armstrong, Bruce K.; Woodward, Alistair; Villegas, Rodrigo; et. al.

Abstract

Purpose: Associations between cellular telephone use and glioma risk have been examined in several epidemiological studies including the 13-country INTERPHONE study. Although results showed no positive association between cellular telephone use and glioma risk overall, no increased risk for long-term users, and no exposure-response relationship, there was an elevated risk for those in the highest decile of cumulative call time. However, results may be biased as data were collected during a period of rapidly increasing cellular telephone use, and as controls were usually interviewed later in time than cases. Methods: Further analyses were conducted in a subset of five INTERPHONE study countries (Australia, Canada, France, Israel, New Zealand) using a post hoc matching strategy to optimize proximity of case-to control interview dates and age. Results: Although results were generally similar to the original INTERPHONE study, there was some attenuation of the reduced odds ratios and stronger positive associations among long-term users and those in the highest categories for cumulative call time and number of calls (eighth-ninth and 10th decile). Conclusions: Proximity and symmetry in timing of case-to-control interviews should be optimized when exposure patterns are changing rapidly with time. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000389735600002 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volumen: 26
Número: 12
Editorial: Elsevier Science Inc.
Fecha de publicación: 2016
Página de inicio: 827
Página final: 832
DOI:

10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.013

Notas: ISI