Investigation of bias related to differences between case and control interview dates in five INTERPHONE countries
Abstract
Purpose: Associations between cellular telephone use and glioma risk have been examined in several epidemiological studies including the 13-country INTERPHONE study. Although results showed no positive association between cellular telephone use and glioma risk overall, no increased risk for long-term users, and no exposure-response relationship, there was an elevated risk for those in the highest decile of cumulative call time. However, results may be biased as data were collected during a period of rapidly increasing cellular telephone use, and as controls were usually interviewed later in time than cases. Methods: Further analyses were conducted in a subset of five INTERPHONE study countries (Australia, Canada, France, Israel, New Zealand) using a post hoc matching strategy to optimize proximity of case-to control interview dates and age. Results: Although results were generally similar to the original INTERPHONE study, there was some attenuation of the reduced odds ratios and stronger positive associations among long-term users and those in the highest categories for cumulative call time and number of calls (eighth-ninth and 10th decile). Conclusions: Proximity and symmetry in timing of case-to-control interviews should be optimized when exposure patterns are changing rapidly with time. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Más información
Título según WOS: | ID WOS:000389735600002 Not found in local WOS DB |
Título de la Revista: | ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Volumen: | 26 |
Número: | 12 |
Editorial: | Elsevier Science Inc. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
Página de inicio: | 827 |
Página final: | 832 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.013 |
Notas: | ISI |