Abstract

This study was conducted in order to compare the clinical freeway space measurements using three simple methods commonly used by dentists in their practices. The study was performed in 15 young healthy subjects with natural dentition and bilateral molar support. Artificial landmarks (adhesive tape) were placed on the more prominent parts of the nose and chin of each subject. Vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) was measured in the intercuspal position. Postural vertical dimension (PVD) was measured in the following functional conditions: after swallowing saliva, after pronouncing the word "Mississippi", and in a relaxed postural mandibular position (RPMP). Then, the clinical freeway space value in each functional condition was obtained by subtracting VDO from PVD value. Significant differences among clinical freeway space values using three different methods were observed (ANOVA). A significantly higher clinical freeway space value was found using phonetics method than after swallowing and with the mandible in a relaxed postural position (Bonferroni multiple comparison test). No significant differences between swallowing and relaxed methods were found. These results seem to suggest that the measures of clinical freeway space depend upon the method used.