Age at onset versus family history and clinical outcomes in 1,665 international bipolar-I disorder patients

Baldessarini, Ross J.; Tondo, Leonardo; Vazquez, Gustavo H.; Undurraga, Juan; Bolzani, Lorenza; Yildiz, Aysegul; Khalsa, Hari-Mandir K.; Lai, Massimo; Lepri, Beatrice; Lolich, Maria; Maffei, Pier Mario; Salvatore, Paola; Faedda, Gianni L.; Vieta, Eduard; Tohen, Mauricio

Abstract

Early onset in bipolar disorder (BPD) has been associated with greater familial risk and unfavorable clinical outcomes. We pooled data from seven international centers to analyze the relationships of family history and symptomatic as well as functional measures of adult morbidity to onset age, or onset in childhood (age 12), adolescence (12-18), or adulthood (19-55 years). In 1,665 adult, DSM-IV BPD-I patients, onset was 5% in childhood, 28% in adolescence, and 53% at peak ages 15-25. Adolescent and adult onset did not differ by symptomatic morbidity (episodes/year, percentage of months ill, co-morbidity, hospitalization, suicide attempts) or family history. Indications of favorable adult functional outcomes (employment, living independently, marriage and children, and a composite measure including education) ranked, by onset: adult > adolescent > child. Onset in childhood versus adolescence had more episodes/year and more psychiatric co-morbidity. Family history was most prevalent with childhood onset, similar over onset ages 12-40 years, and fell sharply thereafter. Multivariate modeling sustained the impression that family history and poor functional, but not symptomatic, outcomes were associated with younger, especially childhood onset. Early onset was more related to poor functional outcomes than greater symptomatic morbidity, with least favorable outcomes and greater family history with childhood onset.

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000300460400014 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: WORLD PSYCHIATRY
Volumen: 11
Número: 1
Editorial: Wiley
Fecha de publicación: 2012
Página de inicio: 40
Página final: 46
DOI:

10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.006

Notas: ISI