Abstract

Obtaining slip distributions for earthquakes results in an ill-posed inverse problem. While this implies that only limited and uncertain information can be recovered from the data, inferences are typically made based only on a single regularized model. Here, we develop an inversion approach that can quantify uncertainties in a Bayesian probabilistic framework for the finite fault inversion (FFI) problem. The approach is suitably efficient for rapid source characterization and includes positivity constraints for model parameters, a common practice in FFI, via coordinate transformation to logarithmic space. The resulting inverse problem is nonlinear and the most probable solution can be obtained by iterative linearization. In addition, model uncertainties are quantified by approximating the posterior probability distribution by a Gaussian distribution in logarithmic space. This procedure is straightforward since an analytic expression for the Hessian of the objective function is obtained. In addition to positivity, we apply smoothness regularization to the model in logarithmic space. Simulations based on surface wave data show that smoothing in logarithmic space penalizes abrupt slip changes less than smoothing in linear space. Even so, the main slip features of models that are smooth in linear space are recovered well with logarithmic smoothing. Our synthetic experiments also show that, for the data set we consider, uncertainty is low at the shallow portion of the fault and increases with depth. In addition, a simulation with a large station azimuthal gap of 180 degrees significantly increases the slip uncertainties. Further, the marginal posterior probabilities obtained from our approximate method are compared with numerical Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. We conclude that the Gaussian approximation is reasonable and meaningful inferences can be obtained from it. Finally, we apply the new approach to observed surface wave records from the great Illapel earthquake (Chile, 2015, M-w = 8.3). The location and amplitude of our inferred peak slip is consistent with other published solutions but the spatial slip distribution is more compact, likely because of the logarithmic regularization. We also find a minor slip patch downdip, mainly in an oblique direction, which is poorly resolved compared to the main slip patch and may be an artefact. We conclude that quantifying uncertainties of finite slip models is crucial for their meaningful interpretation, and therefore rapid uncertainty quantification can be critical if such models are to be used for emergency response.