Abstract

This study analyzes the application made by the Supreme Court of the procedure for the liminal rejection of the cassation appeal of art. 782 CPC, in relation to the legal concept of regulatory norms (laws), and the ways in which it has been specifically used as the basis forthe underestimating of the resource in limine. On the other hand, we have investigated theinconsistencies that arise between the jurisprudential concepts of the norms (laws) regulatingthe test and that of sana crítica , as soon as the latter is initially excluded from the first one. We expose the relation that has the previous things with the determination of the infractions of lawwith casattional relevance.