A contrastive analysis of the factorial structure of the PCL-R: Which model fits best the data?
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine which of the factorial solutions proposed for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) of two, three, four factors, and unidimensional fitted best the data. Two trained and experienced independent raters scored 197 prisoners from the Villabona Penitentiary (Asturias, Spain), age range 21 to 73 years (M = 36.0, SD = 9.7), of whom 60.12% were reoffenders and 73% had committed violent crimes. The results revealed that the two-factor correlational, three-factor hierarchical without testlets, four-factor correlational and hierarchical, and unidimensional models were a poor fit for the data (CFI = .86), and the three-factor model with testlets was a reasonable fit for the data (CFI = .93). The scale resulting from the three-factor hierarchical model with testlets (13 items) classified psychopathy significantly higher than the original 20-item scale. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for theoretical models of psychopathy, decision-making, prison classification and intervention, and prevention. (C) 2014 Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid. Production by Elsevier Espafia, S.L. All rights reserved.
Más información
| Título según WOS: | ID WOS:000347598300003 Not found in local WOS DB |
| Título de la Revista: | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED TO LEGAL CONTEXT |
| Volumen: | 7 |
| Número: | 1 |
| Editorial: | COLEGIO OFICIAL PSICOLOGOS MADRID |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| Página de inicio: | 23 |
| Página final: | 30 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.10.001 |
| Notas: | ISI |