Abstract

This study deals with the problem of diverse procedural means for the accessrationalization to a cassational recourse. Its core deals specifically with the selection meansof the best known recourses among our procedural tradition, which are assessed within thecurrent cassational system framework and a future amendment as the one proposed in the CivilProcedural Code Project, which is currently being discussed in Congress. On the other hand,and dealing with the aforementioned, we state that any amendment must keep in mind thecentral issue about unification and the legal value to be granted to it in the Chilean cassationalsystem being discussed. These two issues comprehended in the object of study have differentpoints of connection. The scope of the later is exposed throughout the present article.