Six-Month Outcomes after Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery

Mazer, C. D.; Whitlock, R. P.; Fergusson, D. A.; Belley-Cote, E.; Connolly, K.; Khanykin, B.; Gregory, A. J.; de Medicis, E.; Carrier, F. M.; McGuinness, S.; Young, P. J.; Byrne, K.; Villar, J. C.; Royse, A.; Grocott, H. P.; et. al.

Abstract

BACKGROUND We reported previously that, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive transfusion strategy was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or 28 days after surgery, whichever came first. We now report the clinical outcomes at 6 months after surgery. METHODS We randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery to a restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was 7.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively) or a liberal red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was 9.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively when the patient was in the intensive care unit (ICU] or was 8.5 g per deciliter when the patient was in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis occurring within 6 months after the initial surgery. An expanded secondary composite outcome included all the components of the primary outcome as well as emergency department visit, hospital readmission, or coronary revascularization occurring within 6 months after the index surgery. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the two composite outcomes. RESULTS At 6 months after surgery, the primary composite outcome had occurred in 402 of 2317 patients (17.4%) in the restrictive-threshold group and in 402 of 2347 patients (17.1%) in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference before rounding, 0.22 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.95 to 2.39; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18; P-=0.006 for noninferiority). Mortality was 6.2 0 10 in the restrictive-threshold group and 6.4% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.21). There were no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy for red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis at 6 months after surgery.

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000445835100007 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volumen: 379
Número: 13
Editorial: MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
Fecha de publicación: 2018
Página de inicio: 1224
Página final: 1233
DOI:

10.1056/NEJMoa1808561

Notas: ISI