Abstract

Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among males in the United States. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard treatment for advanced or metastatic CaP. However, during ADT, CaP progresses from an androgen-sensitive (AS-CaP) to a more aggressive, and eventually lethal, castration-resistant (CRPC) phenotype. There is evidence to suggest that the prostate tumor mass is under tight control of endothelial microvasculature due to an increase in angiogenesis by tumor cells. Nevertheless, now there is evidence to support that this influence is not one-directional and that the endothelial cells secrete a large number of active substances (angiocrine factors), which may directly or indirectly influence tumor growth and progression. However, the direct impacts of the endothelium on prostate tumor progression or the molecular mechanisms that are involved in this communication remain unclear. Here we investigated the potential influence of endothelium-derived paracrine factors on prostate cancer biology and the role of connexins in these interactions, since connexins play a major role in cell-cell communication and form a bidirectional signaling pathway to assemble gap junctions and alter cell behaviors. We measured the effect of conditioned media (CM) obtained from a primary culture of human endothelial cells isolated from umbilical vein (HUVEC) on viability, proliferation, migration and invasion of CaP cell lines (LNCaP, LNCaP-C4-2 and PC3) and in the metastatic potential by in vivo assays using co-injection of CaP cell with HUVEC or injection of CaP cells pre-incubated with CM from HUVEC in a zebrafish embryo model. Finally, we studied the expression and the role of connexins on this stimulation using pharmacological (GJIC inhibitors) approaches. All together, our results showed that CM from endothelial cell induces an increases in the viability and proliferation in all CaP cell lines (LNCaP, LNCaP-C4-2 and PC3) but only increases migration of the CRPC cell lines (LNCaP-C4-2 and PC3). We also observed in our in vivo model that endothelial cells either through cell-cell interaction or by paracrine communication increases the metastatic ability of the CaP cells. Moreover, the increase in viability and migration of CaP cells observed with CM from endothelial cells was blocked using inhibitors of gap junctions. Real-time PCR analyses detected an up-regulation of Cx43 mRNA after exposition to CM from endothelial cells. Our data suggest that angiocrine communication between endothelial cells and CaP cells increases proliferation and migration of more aggressive CaP cells which could be important for the acquisition of the aggressive phenotype of the disease, and this interaction could be mediated by Cx43. Delineation of such critical players may culminate in identifying therapeutic targets or biomarkers to counteract CaP, especially advanced CaP