COMPARING DIRECT CARBONATE AND STANDARD GRAPHITE C-14 DETERMINATIONS OF BIOGENIC CARBONATES

Bright, Jordon; Ebert, Chris; Southon, John R.; Whitacre, Katherine; Albano, Paolo G.; Frazer, Thomas K.; Hua, Quan; Kowalewski, Michal; Oakley, David; Parker, Wesley G.; Retelle, Michael; Ritter, Matias do Nascimento; Rivadeneira, Marcelo M.; Scarponi, Daniele; Yanes, Yurena; et. al.

Abstract

The direct carbonate procedure for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) dating of submilligram samples of biogenic carbonate without graphitization is becoming widely used in a variety of studies. We compare the results of 153 paired direct carbonate and standard graphite 14C determinations on single specimens of an assortment of biogenic carbonates. A reduced major axis regression shows a strong relationship between direct carbonate and graphite percent Modern Carbon (pMC) values (m = 0.996; 95% CI [0.991-1.001]). An analysis of differences and a 95% confidence interval on pMC values reveals that there is no significant difference between direct carbonate and graphite pMC values for 76% of analyzed specimens, although variation in direct carbonate pMC is underestimated. The difference between the two methods is typically within 2 pMC, with 61% of direct carbonate pMC measurements being higher than their paired graphite counterpart. Of the 36 specimens that did yield significant differences, all but three missed the 95% significance threshold by 1.2 pMC or less. These results show that direct carbonate 14C dating of biogenic carbonates is a cost-effective and efficient complement to standard graphite 14C dating.

Más información

Título según WOS: COMPARING DIRECT CARBONATE AND STANDARD GRAPHITE C-14 DETERMINATIONS OF BIOGENIC CARBONATES
Título según SCOPUS: COMPARING DIRECT CARBONATE and STANDARD GRAPHITE 14C DETERMINATIONS of BIOGENIC CARBONATES
Título de la Revista: Radiocarbon
Volumen: 63
Número: 2
Editorial: Cambridge University Press
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Página final: 403
Idioma: English
DOI:

10.1017/RDC.2020.131

Notas: ISI, SCOPUS