Humoral Immune Response of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac Vaccinations in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort

Clavero, Rene; Parra-Lucares, Alfredo; Mendez-Valdes, Gabriel; Villa, Eduardo; Bravo, Karin; Mondaca, Evelyn; Aranda, Josseline; Brignardello, Rose; Gajardo, Cynthia; Ordenes, Angelica; Colombo, Evelyn; Tapia, Jessica; Etcheverry, Andoni; Zuniga, Jose; Toro, Luis

Abstract

The CoronaVac vaccine is the most used anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine worldwide. Previous data indicate that this vaccine produces a lower immune response than RNA vaccines such as BNT162b2. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have an increased rate of COVID-19 and a reduced immune response to vaccinations. Currently, there is little data on this population's immune response induced by CoronaVac. Methods: This study involved a prospective cohort of ESRD patients in chronic hemodialysis who received a two-dose immunization scheme of either CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) or BNT162b2 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech). We measured the plasma levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. We determined antibody titers before immunization, 2 and 4 months after two doses, plus 4 months after a booster dose. Results: We evaluated 208 patients in three hemodialysis centers. The mean age was 62.6 +/- 15.6 years, of whom 91 were female (41.75%). Eighty-one patients (38.94%) received the BNT162b2 vaccine and 127 (61.06%) received the CoronaVac vaccine. Patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine had a higher humoral response compared to those who received the CoronaVac vaccine (4 months after the second dose: BNT162b2: 88.89%, CoronaVac: 51.97%, p 0.001; 4 months after the booster: BNT162b2: 98.77%, CoronaVac: 86.61%, p 0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the CoronaVac vaccine induced a lower humoral response than the BNT162b2 vaccine in ESRD patients on hemodialysis.

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000858863200001 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: VACCINES
Volumen: 10
Número: 9
Editorial: MDPI
Fecha de publicación: 2022
DOI:

10.3390/vaccines10091542

Notas: ISI