Abstract

As an introduction, contemporary debate with Hegelianism will be settled in general lines, whilst critically pointing to the legislator subject as well as to new readings opened to contingency. In a second moment, we will outline the arguments presented in the “Lectures on the Philosophy of History”, first highlighting its identitary character, then problematizing the relevance of such an otherwise based usage, ie on the basis of relational thinking and therefore both ontologically dinamic and empirically comparative. Lastlly, it is a issue to raise the hypothesis of withdrawing, so to speak, a modus operandi in Hegelianism without, however, making system. In this sense, the modal concept of «possibility» would replace that of «freedom» in order to build a contingency rationallity