Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation under the GeoMIP G1 scenario

Moore, John C.; Rinke, Annette; Yu, Xiaoyong; Ji, Duoying; Cui, Xuefeng; Li, Yan; Alterskjaer, Kari; Kristjansson, Jon Egill; Muri, Helene; Boucher, Olivier; Huneeus, Nicolas; Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Niemeier, Ulrike; Schulz, Michael; et. al.

Abstract

We analyze simulated sea ice changes in eight different Earth System Models that have conducted experiment G1 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). The simulated response of balancing abrupt quadrupling of CO2 (abrupt4xCO2) with reduced shortwave radiation successfully moderates annually averaged Arctic temperature rise to about 1 degrees C, with modest changes in seasonal sea ice cycle compared with the preindustrial control simulations (piControl). Changes in summer and autumn sea ice extent are spatially correlated with temperature patterns but much less in winter and spring seasons. However, there are changes of 20% in sea ice concentration in all seasons, and these will induce changes in atmospheric circulation patterns. In summer and autumn, the models consistently simulate less sea ice relative to preindustrial simulations in the Beaufort, Chukchi, East Siberian, and Laptev Seas, and some models show increased sea ice in the Barents/Kara Seas region. Sea ice extent increases in the Greenland Sea, particularly in winter and spring and is to some extent associated with changed sea ice drift. Decreased sea ice cover in winter and spring in the Barents Sea is associated with increased cyclonic activity entering this area under G1. In comparison, the abrupt4xCO2 experiment shows almost total sea ice loss in September and strong correlation with regional temperatures in all seasons consistent with open ocean conditions. The tropospheric circulation displays a Pacific North America pattern-like anomaly with negative phase in G1-piControl and positive phase under abrupt4xCO2-piControl. Key Points Analysis of eight ESM focused on Arctic sea ice and feedback Response of Arctic to G1 geoengineering shows clear regional differences Sea ice is far different in detail under G1 than in pre industrial AD1LK 119 (2): 567-583 JAN 27 2014 253 FUTURE CLIMATE PROJECTIONS NORTHERN-HEMISPHERE TELECONNECTION PATTERN GEOPOTENTIAL HEIGHT BARENTS SEA IMPACT WINTER VARIABILITY TRACK MODES Moore, John C Moore, John C John C Moore Schulz, Michael Schulz, Michael Michael Schulz Huneeus, Nicolás Huneeus, Nicolás Nicolás Huneeus Ji, Duoying Ji, Duoying Duoying Ji Watanabe, Shingo Watanabe, Shingo Shingo Watanabe Huneeus, Nicolas Huneeus, Nicolas Nicolas Huneeus Robock, Alan Robock, Alan Alan Robock Boucher, Olivier Boucher, Olivier Olivier Boucher Kravitz, Ben Kravitz, Ben Ben Kravitz Muri, Helene Muri, Helene Helene Muri Rinke, Annette Rinke, Annette Annette Rinke Yang, Shuting Yang, Shuting Shuting Yang Watanabe, Shingo Watanabe, Shingo Shingo Watanabe Huneeus, Nicolas Huneeus, Nicolas Nicolas Huneeus Tilmes, Simone Tilmes, Simone Simone Tilmes Robock, Alan Robock, Alan Alan Robock Alterskjaer, Kari Alterskjaer, Kari Kari Alterskjaer

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:000332995300006 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volumen: 119
Número: 2
Editorial: AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
Fecha de publicación: 2014
Página de inicio: 567
Página final: 583
Notas: ISI