Abstract

This article analyzes the alleged quality of intangible property of fishing authorizations. From the constitutional perspective, the objective and subjective levels of property, the concept of intangible property, the nature of the fishing authorization and the differences with concession and permit are highlighted. This work concludes by stating that the fishing authorization does not have the quality of intangible property, since it neither grants a right independent from the freedom to acquire any kind of properties nor generates patrimonial effects for itself, since they depend on the access regime to fishing currently in force.