Abstract

Scientific communication through outreach and engagement activities is currently recognized as an important element of researcher’s work, however, participation by scientists in this type of activities remains low. Many scientists do not understand the purpose and benefits that outreach provides for the public at large, which may further account for a low percentage of time devoted to scientific communication. The growing societal role of science communication becomes paradoxical in light of the limited motivation by scientists to participate in these activities. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide a brief, limited and systematic summary of 12 arguments that justify why scientists should be communicating their work to society. These arguments may be useful for scientific and technological institutions in developed countries, and especially in developing countries, where the social bond to science and technology is more limited.