Abstract

Despite the recognized difficulties associated with academic writing and the countless investigations about such type of writing and the specialized discourse, the study of the production of specialized texts has not been addressed in a comprehensive way. On the contrary, it has focused on specific aspects (cognitive, textual, disciplinary) without relating them, therefore, the complexity of writing as a multidimensional process has not been evinced. In this context, the objective of this research is to correlate the linguistic-discursive features of professional genres for academic purposes produced by law students with the variables: self-efficacy perception in writing (SPW), linguistic -discursive quality (LDQ), and disciplinary assessment (DA). Within the framework of a correlational study, we analyzed a corpus made up of 218 professional genres for academic purposes produced by law students from two Chilean universities. Among the main results, we highlight that the linguistic-discursive features analyzed correlate significantly and, preferably, with the LDQ and DA variables. Only in two genres we identify significant correlations associated with SPW. Besides, we found that SPW is subordinated to genre. In conclusion, the results show that, in the analysis of legal texts, to determine which variables interact with linguistic features, the distinctive features of each genre must be considered. Therefore, non-specific statements for the discipline of Law or legal genres in general are insufficient. In this sense, our research can be useful to strengthen the didactics of writing in Law.