Abstract

Maximum a posteriori and Bayes estimators are two common methods of point estimation in Bayesian statistics. It is commonly accepted that maximum a posteriori estimators are a limiting case of Bayes estimators with 0-1 loss. In this paper, we provide a counterexample which shows that in general this claim is false. We then correct the claim that by providing a level-set condition for posterior densities such that the result holds. Since both estimators are defined in terms of optimization problems, the tools of variational analysis find a natural application to Bayesian point estimation.