Abstract

Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity (PD) are increasingly becoming relevant for conservation decisions. PD measures are based on phylogenies estimated from molecular data. This paper addresses the question of how different molecular markers impact PD spatial patterns. We first conducted a simple simulation to explore the effect of deep and shallow changes in topology (simulating variations in molecular markers), using ultrametric and non-ultrametric trees, and then used a dataset of Chilean flora with four sets of markers to assess potential differences in spatial patterns of PD ranks using different markers and types of trees. The simulation consistently showed that the difference in PD rank was lower for ultrametric trees than for phylograms. A similar trend was observed using the Chilean flora dataset, with among-markers variability in spatial patterns of the PD metrics lower for ultrametric than for non-ultrametric trees, depicted as top 2.5 and 5% hotspots. Frequency distribution of PD values differed among markers as well, with this variation less apparent for ultrametric trees. We conclude that the choice of markers impacts spatial patterns of PD, and these results vary more strongly for phylograms, suggesting that ultrametric trees are more robust to the choice of marker.