Serum identification of at-risk MASH: The metabolomics-advanced steatohepatitis fibrosis score (MASEF)

Noureddin, Mazen; Truong, Emily; Mayo, Rebeca; Martinez-Arranz, Ibon; Banales, Jesus M.; Minchole, Itziar; Arrese, Marco; Cusi, Kenneth; Arias-Loste, Maria Teresa; Bruha, Radan; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Iruzubieta, Paula; Aller, Rocio; Ampuero, Javier; Calleja, Jose Luis; et. al.

Abstract

--- - "Background: Early identification of those with NAFLD activity score >= 4 and significant fibrosis (>= F2) or at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a priority as these patients are at increased risk for disease progression and may benefit from therapies. We developed and validated a highly specific metabolomics-driven score to identify at-risk MASH." - "Methods: We included derivation (n = 790) and validation (n = 565) cohorts from international tertiary centers. Patients underwent laboratory assessment and liver biopsy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Based on 12 lipids, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, the MASEF score was developed to identify at-risk MASH and compared to the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score. We further compared the performance of a FIB-4 + MASEF algorithm to that of FIB-4 + liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)." - "Results: The diagnostic performance of the MASEF score showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.79), 0.69, 0.74, 0.53, and 0.85 in the derivation cohort, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), 0.78, 0.65, 0.48, and 0.88 in the validation cohort, while FibroScan-AST performance in the validation cohort was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.79; p = 0.064), 0.58, 0.79, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. FIB-4 + MASEF showed similar overall performance compared with FIB-4 + LSM by VCTE (p = 0.69) to identify at-risk MASH." - "Conclusion: MASEF is a promising diagnostic tool for the assessment of at-risk MASH. It could be used alternatively to LSM by VCTE in the algorithm that is currently recommended by several guidance publications."

Más información

Título según WOS: ID WOS:001189733500007 Not found in local WOS DB
Título de la Revista: HEPATOLOGY
Volumen: 79
Número: 1
Editorial: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Fecha de publicación: 2024
Página de inicio: 135
Página final: 148
DOI:

10.1097/HEP.0000000000000542

Notas: ISI