Consumer preferences and sensory characteristics of eggs from family farms
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate consumer habits as well as the sensory perception and characteristics of farm eggs produced in Los Rios, Chile. Data were collected from an online survey of 197 respondents and a sensory evaluation carried out by 30 untrained panelists of 4 types of eggs (brown-shell and blue-shell eggs acquired from family farms, free-range eggs acquired from large, industrial systems, and whiteshell cage eggs from industrial, cage systems.) To evaluate differences and preferences, data were analyzed in a GLM. In addition, sensory evaluation was analyzed using principal component analysis. In accordance with the survey, 99% of the participants eat eggs (P < 0.001), 58% eat 1 to 3 eggs/wk, and 84% declared to consume eggs at home (<0.0001). Surveyed participants reported that price and size are the determining factors (31%) when purchasing eggs. Among the physical characteristic for consumers, yolk color was the most important attribute rather than white color, egg appearance, texture, flavor, or odor. In the consumer acceptability test, farm eggs (either brown or blue shell) received the most favorable sensory evaluation by the panel and were preferred to both free-range and white-shell cage eggs. Yolk color was the most influential parameter in making this difference. Brown farm eggs were predominately selected for greatest general satisfaction by participants in both the sensory evaluation (P = 0.008) and in the survey (40%; P = 0.026). There were no differences between farm eggs (brown and blue shell, P > 0.05) in the evaluated parameters. There was a consequence in the information given from surveyed consumers and the sensory panel with the yolk color.
Más información
Título según WOS: | ID WOS:000584401800110 Not found in local WOS DB |
Título de la Revista: | POULTRY SCIENCE |
Volumen: | 99 |
Número: | 11 |
Editorial: | Elsevier |
Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
Página de inicio: | 6239 |
Página final: | 6246 |
DOI: |
10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.064 |
Notas: | ISI |