Abstract

Light absorbing particles (LAPs) present high absorbance and contribute to reducing the snow albedo when deposited on snow surfaces. This deposition can be caused by aerosols transported from natural or anthropogenic, either distant or nearby sources. In this study, snow was artificially contaminated with soil samples collected in the Central Andes (near El Yeso dam) to simulate the most common nearby source of Mineral Dust (MD) deposition onto snow surface. Andean soil samples previously conditioned were characterized through Single Particle Optical Sizing (SPOS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for the determination of optical properties. Spectral snow albedo was measured in situ with a spectrorradiometric system. To evaluate the heterogeneity of the particle distribution over the snow surface, aerial photographs were taken with a drone to apply a visual color segmentation of the surface and to determine the equivalent MD concentration. Experimental snow albedo was compared with theoretical values obtained with the OptiPar radiative transfer model. Inputs for the model were: the MD refractive index (calculated from the mineralogical composition and morphology of MD) and particle size, cloudiness, snow density, surface roughness, snow grain size, and LAPs concentration (obtained from the snow samples collected during the experiments and analyzed in the laboratory). Small black carbon concentrations were found in natural snow and considered in the simulations. Spectral albedo measurements showed high albedo reductions in the UV and VIS range (300 - 800 nm), being less significant in the NIR range (800 - 1700 nm). A nonlinear behavior was observed in broadband albedo when increasing MD concentration. For lower values of MD concentration (lower than 1500 mg kg−1), a significant albedo reduction rate of 0.1 units per 1000 mg kg−1 was found, while at higher concentrations (¿ 3500 mg kg−1), such reduction tends to the minimum. Simulated values with OptiPar are in agreement with measured albedo, but some differences are observed, probably due to the refractive index considered, the snow surface roughness, and the non-uniform MD concentration in snow.