Abstract

Clinical guidelines are recommendations of how to diagnose, treat, and manage a patient's medical condition. Health organizations must measure adherence to clinical guidelines to enhance the quality of service, but due to the complexity of the medical environment, there is no simple way of measuring adherence to clinical guidelines. This scoping review will systematically assess the criteria used to measure adherence to clinical guidelines in the past 20 years and explore the suitability of using process mining techniques. We will use a workflow protocol based on declarative and temporal constraints to translate the narrative text rules in the publications into a highlevel process model. This approach will enable us to explore the main patterns and gaps identified when measuring adherence to clinical guidelines and how they affect the adoption of process mining techniques. The main contributions of this paper are a) a comprehensive analysis of the criteria used for measuring adherence, considering a diverse set of medical conditions b) a framework that will classify the level of complexity of the rules used to measure adherence based on declarative and temporal constraints c) list of key trends and gaps identified in the literature and how they relate to the use of process mining techniques in healthcare.