Abstract

This article delves into the relational realms between non-classical logics, legal practices, and legal education. Through a review of scientific literature, we particularly address intuitionistic, fuzzy, and paraconsistent logics, examining their challenges and contributions to the legal field. Despite obstacles, such as resistance to change, we observe significant progress in the adoption of these approaches. The article concludes by presenting the various perspectives used and advocating for a transformation in legal education, both in the official and the hidden curriculum of lawyer training, with the aim of more comprehensively addressing the complex, contradictory, and uncertain problems that characterize the present world.