Abstract

In 2021, Chile became the first country to discuss two initiatives addressing the potential misuse of neurotechnologies: a constitutional amendment (Bill 13827-19) and a bill to create neurorights (Bill 13828-19). While the constitutional reform was swiftly approved, the bill for the creation of specific neurorights remains under discussion in the Chamber of Deputies. Despite initial support, both initiatives currently face criticism. Meanwhile, Chile has advanced in regulating AI systems through legislative proposals (Bills 16821-19 / 15869-19). A study by Humeres et al. (2025) identifies three key controversies in Chile’s AI regulation process: deflection of technology liability, instrumentalization of policy, and moralization of technology use. This chapter explores how this analysis focused on sources of controversy could inform the neurorights debate which is in need of a systematic socio-political analysis. Applying this framework could help categorize the diverse positions within the discussion, providing a more comprehensive understanding of its development.