Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public transport analysis

Tirachini A.; Hensher DA; Jara-Diaz, SR

Abstract

We compare analytically and numerically the optimised performance of different urban public transport modes for three objectives: total cost minimisation, profit maximisation, and welfare maximisation. We find that under optimal operation, buses provide lower waiting time and operator costs, therefore the only possible advantage for rail is providing a lower in-vehicle time cost if trains are faster. Using Australian data, we found that bus rapid transit provides a lower total cost, higher profit and welfare, up to their capacity. Introducing passengers dislike of crowding and train-specific attraction elements might make Heavy Rail the most cost effective mode for high levels of demand. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Más información

Título según WOS: Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public transport analysis
Título según SCOPUS: Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public transport analysis
Título de la Revista: TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW
Volumen: 46
Número: 6
Editorial: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Fecha de publicación: 2010
Página de inicio: 1148
Página final: 1168
Idioma: English
URL: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1366554510000190
DOI:

10.1016/j.tre.2010.01.008

Notas: ISI, SCOPUS