Abstract

Context. As part of the search for planets around evolved stars, we can understand planet populations around significantly higher-mass stars than the Sun on the main sequence. This population is difficult to study any other way, such as using radial-velocities to measure planet masses and orbital mechanics, since the stars are too hot and rotate too fast to present the quantity of narrow stellar spectral lines that is necessary for measuring velocities at the level of a few m s-1. Aims. Our goal is to estimate stellar parameters for all of the giant stars from the EXPRESS project, which aims to detect planets orbiting evolved stars, and study their occurrence rate as a function of stellar mass. Methods. We analysed the high-resolution echelle spectra of these stars and computed their atmospheric parameters by measuring the equivalent widths for a set of iron lines, using an updated method implemented during this work. Physical parameters, such as mass and radius, were computed by interpolating through a grid of stellar evolutionary models, following a procedure that carefully takes into account the post-main sequence evolutionary phases. The atmospheric parameters, as well as the photometric and parallax data, are used as constraints during the interpolation process. The probabilities of the star being in the red giant branch (RGB) or the horizontal branch (HB) are estimated from the derived distributions. Results. We obtained atmospheric and physical stellar parameters for the whole EXPRESS sample, which comprises a total of 166 evolved stars. We find that 101 of them are most likely first ascending the RGB phase, while 65 of them have already reached the HB phase. The mean derived mass is 1.41 ± 0.46 M⊙ and 1.87 ± 0.53 M⊙ for RGB and HB stars, respectively. To validate our method, we compared our derived physical parameters with data from interferometry and asteroseismology studies. In particular, when comparing to stellar radii derived from interferometric angular diameters, we find: ΔRinter = -0.11 R⊙, which corresponds to a 1.7% difference. Similarly, when comparing with asteroseismology, we obtain the following results: Δlog g = 0.07 cgs (2.4%), ΔR = -0.12 R⊙ (1.5%), ΔM = 0.08 M⊙ (6.2%), and Δage = -0.55 Gyr (11.9%). Additionally, we compared our derived atmospheric parameters with previous spectroscopic studies. We find the following results: ΔTeff = 22 K (0.5%), Δlog g = -0.03 (1.0%) and Δ[Fe/H] = -0.04 dex (2%). We also find a mean systematic difference in the mass with respect to those presented in the EXPRESS original catalogue of ΔM = -0.28 ± 0.27 M⊙, corresponding to a systematic mean difference of 16%. For the rest of the atmospheric and physical parameters we find a good agreement between the original catalogue and the results presented here. Finally, we find excellent agreement between the spectroscopic and trigonometric log g values, showing the internal consistency and robustness of our method. Conclusions