Abstract

In line with concerns emerged in the fieldwork of an investigation on migratory processes of Colombians and Peruvians with non-heteronormative sex-generic subjectivations, the article problematizes the apparently clear boundaries drawn between the attributes defined to select the subjects of the study: the relationship time-space involved in migratory displacement, and the “homosexual” sex-generic subjectivation. From these reflections, and from contributions from authors who have worked around the notion, an interstitial way of thinking about the border is proposed.