Contracting with moral hazard, adverse selection and risk neutrality: when does one size fit all?
Keywords: Adverse selection; Limited liability; Monotonicity; Moral hazard; Optimal mechanism
Abstract
This paper studies a principal-agent relationship when both are risk-neutral and in the presence of adverse selection and moral hazard. Contracts must satisfy the limited-liability and monotonicity conditions. We provide sufficient conditions under which the optimal contract is simple, in the sense that each type is offered the same contract. These are: the action and the agentâs type are complements, and the outputâs cumulative distribution function is such that the marginal rate of substitution between the action and the agentâs type is the same for each possible output realization. Furthermore, under the average monotone likelihood ratio property, the optimal contract is a call-option contract as in Innes (J Econ Theory 52(1):45â67, 1990). The results shed light on the fact that sometimes contracts are not highly dependent on individual characteristics as predicted in most pure moral hazard and pure adverse selection settings.
Más información
| Título según WOS: | Contracting with moral hazard, adverse selection and risk neutrality: when does one size fit all? |
| Título según SCOPUS: | Contracting with moral hazard, adverse selection and risk neutrality: when does one size fit all? |
| Título de la Revista: | International Journal of Game Theory |
| Volumen: | 49 |
| Número: | 2 |
| Editorial: | Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| Página final: | 637 |
| Idioma: | English |
| DOI: |
10.1007/s00182-019-00700-5 |
| Notas: | ISI, SCOPUS |