Pablo Alonso Coello

Investigador Principal

Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano

Barcelona, España

Líneas de Investigación

Metodología guías de práctica clínica Metodología revisiones sistemáticas Toma decisiones compartidas Infecciones respiratorias agudas



Experiencia Académica

  •   Profesor Asistente Other



    Hamilton, Canada

    2013 - 2018

  •   Profesor Asociado Other



    Barcelona, España

    2010 - 2011

  •   Profesor Asistente Other

    Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona


    Barcelona, España

    2018 - A la fecha

Experiencia Profesional

  •   Senior Researcher Full Time

    Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau

    Barcelona, España

    2015 - A la fecha

Premios y Distinciones

  •   Highly cited researcher

    Clarivate Analytics

    Reino Unido, 2016

    Desde el año 2016 incluido en la lista de los investigadores más citados del mundo de la última década publicado por Clarivate Analytics


Article (77)

A comparison of four risk models for the prediction of cardiovascular complications in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation undergoing non-cardiac surgery
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines
Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines RESPONSE
Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma
Efficacy and safety of treatment with dupilumab for severe asthma: A systematic review of the EAACI guidelines-Recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma
Risk of stroke and other adverse outcomes in patients with perioperative atrial fibrillation 1 year after non-cardiac surgery
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption RESPONSE
A systematic evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for COPD and exacerbations used in randomised controlled trials on the management of COPD exacerbations
Association between complications and death within 30 days after noncardiac surgery
Colorectal cancer guidelines seldom include the patient perspective
Cost-conscious high-quality care and guideline development education: a strange contradiction or simple solution?
Delayed antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment Approaches for Schistosomiasis and Strongyloidiasis in Newly-Arrived Migrants from Endemic Countries in the EU/EEA: A Systematic Review
Extending the RIGHT statement for reporting adapted practice guidelines in healthcare: the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist protocol
GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness
GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency
Most guideline organizations lack explicit guidance in how to incorporate cost considerations
Outcomes reported on the management of COPD exacerbations: a systematic survey of randomised controlled trials
Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiometabolic Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
Screening and diagnosis of oral cancer: a critical quality appraisal of clinical guidelines
Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium
Use of delayed antibiotic prescription in primary care: a cross-sectional study
A systematic review of how patients value COPD outcomes
Association of preoperative glucose concentration with myocardial injury and death after non-cardiac surgery (GlucoVISION): a prospective cohort study
Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
Dental caries prevention in children and adolescents: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines
Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendations
Guideline on terminology and definitions of updating clinical guidelines: The Updating Glossary
Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol
Nutrition guidelines vary widely in methodological quality: an overview of reviews
Preventive activities in women. PAPPS update 2018
Quality of clinical practice guidelines about red blood cell transfusion
Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery
Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience
Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences
Development of a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline questions: the UpPriority Tool protocol
Forty-two systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in values and preferences' studies
GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence
Incorporating patients' views in guideline development: a systematic review of guidance documents
Intensive follow-up for women with breast cancer: review of clinical, economic and patient's preference domains through evidence to decision framework
Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating
Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial
Patients' and physicians' perceptions and attitudes about oral anticoagulation and atrial fibrillation: a qualitative systematic review
Predictors, Prognosis, and Management of New Clinically Important Atrial Fibrillation After Noncardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study
Prevention and assessment of infectious diseases among children and adult migrants arriving to the European Union/European Economic Association: a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews for public health and health systems
Reporting Items for Updated Clinical Guidelines: Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp)
Shared decision making in Spain: Supportive policies and research initiatives, trends and directions for future
Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations
A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach
Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries
Do the spanish clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute bronchiolitis urgently require updating?
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines
GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health
Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group
Health checks in general practice: evidence first, not last
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: A randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format
Prescription Strategies in Acute Uncomplicated Respiratory Infections A Randomized Clinical Trial
Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Survey of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation
The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels
Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers
Women's values and preferences and health state valuations for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy: A cross-sectional interview study
Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community Acquired Pneumonia A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide
The prediction of postoperative stroke or death in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a VISION sub-study

Review (7)

Migrant Healthcare Guidelines: A Systematic Quality Assessment
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions
Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts
Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults
Nutrition in critically ill adults: A systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines
Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effects
Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
Pablo Alonso

Investigador Principal

Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano

Barcelona, España

Gonzalo Neumann

Profesor Asociado

Universidad San Sebastián

Santiago, Chile

María José Martínez

Investigadora Clínica

Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano

Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau

Barcelona, España

gabriel rada


Centro Evidencia UC

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

santiago, Chile

Carlos Zaror

Profesor Asociado

Odontopediatria y Ortodoncia

Universidad de La Frontera

Temuco, Chile

Gerard Urrútia

Professor - Researcher

Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica y Salud Pública, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona

Barcelona, España

Juan Franco

Managing Editor

Centre for Health and Society

Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, Alemania


Direccion Area Odontopediatria

Universidad de los Andes

Santiago, Chile

Eva Madrid

Profesor titular

Public Health

Universidad de valparaiso

Viña del mar, Chile